Two On A Big Ocean The Story of the First Circumnavigation
of the Pacific Basin
in a Small Sailing Ship


      

Other Books by
Hal Roth
| Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch |

Re: lv-ab: Galvanic current

From: Arild Jensen (no email)
Date: Sun Sep 30 2001 - 22:50:12 EDT

  • Next message: Aerofoam: "Re: lv-ab: sander for bottom paint?"

    At 08:15 AM 10/01/2001 -0400, Richard Goodwin wrote:

    >I don't know about that. Personally I wouldn't trust AC to be
    >completely harmless to metals submerged in seawater. Anybody know for
    >sure?
    >
    >Dick

    Arild replies:
    I'm an ABYC certified Marine Electrical Technician. As part of my work I
    get involved with investigating insurance claims.
    On several occasions I have encountered situations where stray AC current
    caused corrosion. No DC current was measured, nor was any DC circuits
    involved. The faulty circuit was clearly an AC circuit and rewiring the AC
    circuit corrected the problem.
    It is especially noticable in aluminum since the rate of corrosion is
    faster in that metal, compared to bronze or stainless steel.
    During ABYC technical committee meetings we have discussed the question of
    whether or not AC current causes corrosion or if only DC currents do.

    The comparison with an electro-plating cell is not completely
    equivalent. In an electro-plating tank you have a controlled environment,
     a strong acid electrolyte and very close proximity of electrodes. You do
    not have a free flow of electrolyte which could carry away ions, nor do
    you have any impurities to which the metallic ions can attach. The
    currents and voltages involved are much greater than what you normally
    experience in a boat.

    Even in a test tube, the results are not conclusive. Hence the ongoing
    debate among experts.
    However, in the real world some of the ions are lost into the surrounding
    water and there is a net loss of mass from the more active metal. And
    some mass is lost in the process of creating hydrogen gas.
    Some purists will argue that what is observed as apparently being AC is
    actually rectified, pulsating DC ; but this argument gets a little obscure
    and is best left to the engineering and physics text books. We are
    discussing overall observed results here.
    You will notice a faster rate of corrosion with DC than AC, because of
    the constant flow of ions.

    Regards

    Arild
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    || The Live-Aboard List : send a "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" request ||
    || in body of message to: ||


  • Next message: Aerofoam: "Re: lv-ab: sander for bottom paint?"



    | Home | Mailing Lists | Bookstore | Weather | Tide Predictions | Bowditch | Trawlerworld |